The Claimant( “C”) a 33-year-old woman, received £61,182 for injuries to her nose that she suffered as a result of undergoing a septorhinoplasty (nose job to improve the appearance of the nose and breathing through the nose)  operation in April 2010.

Despite having further operations to try and rectify her injuries, she continued to have difficulty breathing and also suffered from psychological problems.

C, female, aged 27 at the time of the operation underwent a septorhinoplasty carried out by a private cosmetic surgeon in April 2010. 

C made a claim against the Surgeon (“D”) alleging that  the operation was carried out negligently and/or her consent had not been obtained. As a result of which, C suffered painful symptoms, including bleeding. She was left with a misshapen and functionally impaired (“Polly Beak”) nose and also narrowing of her internal nasal valves and nostril  collapse on the lower part  of the nose. She had a broad nose tip and narrowed airways due to  nostril  reduction and lack of support in  the mid-third of the nose. There was visible scarring to the nasal tip and in the nostril grooves. She was unable to breathe properly. She also  had to sleep with her mouth open, causing her to have a dry throat and lips and waking her up frequently. Her voice sounded nasally. 

Her breathing difficulties had had an adverse impact on her relationship with her boyfriend and also caused her difficulties in her work. 

C also suffered a harmful psychological reaction with symptoms of post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression. 

C underwent an operation in August 2013. The operation improved her cosmetic appearance to one with which she was fairly happy, but she was left with a vulnerable nasal airway. She was informed that  the result of any more revision surgery would be uncertain.  She was also left with psychological effects which she was informed could be helped with cognitive behavioural therapy. 

C’s evidence  was that whilst she was fairly happy with the cosmetic appearance, she had problems breathing through  her nose. This caused her  problems: she snored at night and no longer went to the gym as she had done before to the  initial operation. She said  that if  she had the money she would get advice about a further operation as well as having psychological treatment. Also, unsurprisingly,  she was still distressed by what happened to her.  

 D did not respond to the litigation and Judgement was therefore entered for the Claimant for an amount  of damages to be decided by the Court.  

The judge  found that the Judicial College Guidelines of little help when valuing the claim. 

Estimate of breakdown of damages: 

General Damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenity:  £19,648  

Past treatment : £7825 

Past loss of earnings:  £21,900 

Future cognitive behavioural therapy: £1450 

Future treatment: £3900 

Balance: miscellaneous expenses 

Why Choose Us?

We’ve handled many different types of medical negligence cases and provided expert advice for over 20 years.

  • We offer FREE, no obligation legal advice all throughout
  • Our processes are hassle free & we handle all the paperwork
  • We won't charge you a penny until your case has been settled

Our surgery claims expert:

Sonia Parkes

Litigation Executive